Practice complex reasoning assessments — and actually understand why your decisions worked.
STRATAGEM is the closest thing to practising McKinsey Solve, with one difference: every debrief explains the chain of consequences your decisions set off, not just whether you got the answer "right."
- Two scenario modules (~60 min total)
- Personal debrief explaining your decisions
- Single comparable score (SAR)
- Lifetime access to all beta updates
Not another aptitude quiz.
Most reasoning tests grade you with a percentile and leave. STRATAGEM puts you inside scenarios that behave like real systems — and explains every cascade your decisions set off.
Scenarios, not questions
Investigate, hypothesise, allocate, and watch what plays out. No multiple choice. No timer pressure tricks.
Causal debriefs
Every outcome is reconstructed as a chain: your decision → consequence → secondary effect → final outcome.
One comparable score
The Strategic Aptitude Rating — rolled up from outcome quality, information efficiency, decisions, and risk.
Design a habitat that doesn't collapse
Pick species for three habitat zones, predict cascades before they happen, and adapt as the simulation runs for 60 ticks of forecast shocks and invasives.
- Systems thinking
- Long-horizon prediction
- Adaptation under change
Brief, investigate, then commit your forces
Read incomplete intelligence under time pressure, weigh contradictory evidence, and allocate personnel and equipment before the wind shifts.
- Evidence evaluation
- Triage under uncertainty
- Decision-making with imperfect information
See exactly why you scored what you scored
Every debrief walks the causal chain — the wolf you didn't protect, the browsing pressure that followed, the aspen die-off, the score you ended up with. You learn the system, not the test.
- Counterfactual reasoning
- Causal chain walkthrough
- Personalised strengths and gaps
What you walk away with
A single SAR score, four axis scores, your strongest and weakest moves, and a causal walkthrough of the cascade you set off.
Protecting Wolf at tick 30 would likely have prevented the keystone collapse. Deer browsing pressure would have remained lower, Aspen regeneration would have held, and the late-stage cascade would not have removed Beaver from the wetland — projected SAR +18.
£9.99 · one-time
Both modules · personal debrief · shareable result page · all beta updates included. No subscription, no auto-renewal.
UK VAT calculated at checkout. STRATAGEM is in private beta — scoring is provisional pending calibration.
14-day no-questions-asked refund. See refund & technical issue policy.